SensorTowerSensorTower

Special Delivery: Inside Retail Media on the Top Delivery Platforms

By Sensor Tower·Oct 28, 2026·2 min read

Summary

Delivery retail media is consolidating around distinct platform strengths, and ad ops teams should plan network-by-network rather than treating delivery RMNs as a single channel. Instacart has become the impressions leader: 49% of delivery retail media impressions in 2026 YTD, nearly double its 24% share in 2024, while Grubhub slipped to 13%. DoorDash is second at 28% and has the largest advertiser base, 496 brands versus Instacart's 306; because Instacart produces more impressions from fewer advertisers, its average campaigns are larger. That suggests Instacart may offer greater scale per advertiser, while DoorDash offers broader advertiser coverage and a more balanced category mix.

Category concentration varies sharply. Grubhub is most restaurant-focused, with 88% of impressions from fast food and fast casual; Uber also skews restaurant at 48%, and McDonald's is the top advertiser on both. Instacart is CPG-led, with Food Items at 47% and Beverages at 18%, plus pet, hair care, and household cleaning. DoorDash is most balanced, with no category above 22%; credit cards reach 16%, driven by Chase's DashPass partnership. Chase is the top advertiser across all four networks, showing that non-restaurant and financial partners can use delivery RMNs effectively.

Channel execution is still social-first. Facebook and Instagram capture most impressions, including 87% on Grubhub and 77% on Instacart. Uber has the most diversified mix, with notable TikTok (11%) and YouTube (13%) allocations; Jersey Mike's led TikTok and McDonald's led YouTube. Ad ops should match creative and measurement to each network's mix: social-first for scale on Grubhub/Instacart, diversified video/social testing on Uber, and category-specific targeting on DoorDash. Use Instacart for CPG replenishment and last-minute needs, restaurant networks for offers and discounts, and DoorDash for balanced retail plus card/partnership campaigns. Retail partnerships like Urban Outfitters and Lowe's further expand delivery occasions, so teams should test broader retail and CPG use cases, not just food. Track advertiser count and impressions per advertiser to benchmark campaign scale and competitive pressure.

Analyst Note

What stands out here is not just Instacart’s impression share gain, but how differently the delivery retail media networks are monetizing. Instacart’s CPG-heavy mix, DoorDash’s balanced category base, Grubhub’s restaurant focus, and Uber’s more diversified channel allocation suggest these platforms are becoming distinct ad environments rather than interchangeable delivery inventory. For ad ops and UA teams, the key implication is that network-level benchmarks may obscure category-level performance: a CPG campaign on Instacart and a restaurant or credit-card push on DoorDash are not comparable buys.

The advertiser-base contrast—DoorDash with more brands but fewer impressions than Instacart—also points to campaign scale and budget concentration as important context when evaluating competitive pressure. Timing matters because retail media budgets are increasingly flowing beyond grocery and marketplace placements into delivery apps, while Facebook and Instagram still anchor most impressions. Uber’s larger TikTok and YouTube allocations are worth watching as a signal of channel-mix experimentation, but the article shows social remains the default.

The broader trend is delivery RMNs using first-party transaction and partnership data to widen advertiser categories beyond food, which raises measurement and attribution questions across an increasingly fragmented retail media landscape.

You Might Also Like

MintegralMintegral

Ad Platforms Are Like LLMs. Which Frontier Model Are You Running On?

Ad platforms are evolving from single-signal networks to integrated 'multimodal' systems, mirroring the LLM-to-LMM leap. The winners fuse creative, attribution, bidding, audience, and supply data into one model, creating a closed learning loop that compounds performance. Fragmented stacks pay an integration tax—data lost across vendors degrades training and widens the gap each quarter. Recent M&A (Fox–Roku/Publicis–LiveRamp/Walmart CTV) is actually about acquiring missing data modalities. For ad ops leaders, the key question is not point-solution quality but how many data signals feed one platform and how quickly it improves. Choose partners with unified data graphs to benefit from accelerating intelligence.

Jeff Sue GM, Americas at Mintegral·Sep 9, 2026·4 min readRead article →
MolocoMoloco

Inside Moloco's CARA: the AI that compounds

The open internet presents unique challenges for performance advertising: fragmented identity, closed first-price auctions, and non-stationary supply. Moloco's CARA compound architecture tackles this with six integrated technical domains—Campaign Automation, Supply, Ad Recommendations, Bidding, Creative, and Signals—running on a unified ML infrastructure. Key insights for ad ops: the system continuously learns from every interaction, uses knowledge distillation to serve real-time predictions under 10ms latency, and validates improvements through rigorous live experiments. In 2025, 65 validated model updates reduced CPA by 17% and improved ROAS by 27%. The key takeaway: compound AI architectures that connect prediction, bidding, creative, and data can unlock measurable performance gains beyond walled gardens.

Tal Shaked·Aug 7, 2026·14 min readRead article →
MintegralMintegral

The Next (Agentic) Phase Of Media Buying Is Coming

Agentic AI is shifting media buying from manual execution to strategic oversight. With 91% adoption of Google PMax and 88% of Meta Advantage+, goal-based automation is already standard. The next phase uses AI agents to handle targeting, bidding, and creative optimization in real time, freeing buyers to focus on outcomes, incrementality tests, and strategic bets. Key considerations: ensure AI has direct supply, robust prediction models, and clear optimization goals (install, ROAS, CPE, CPL). The future lies in cross-platform coordination and behavioral targeting, connecting ad spend directly to business value.

Phoena Pang·Jul 9, 2026·6 min readRead article →
AppsFlyerAppsFlyer

Independent Data Collaboration Platforms Are Gone — Except One

Data collaboration platforms are consolidating under ad-centric owners, threatening measurement neutrality. Publicis bought LiveRamp, WPP acquired InfoSum, and LiveRamp absorbed Habu, leaving AppsFlyer as the only major independent player. Brands must vet partners for conflicts: does the platform or its parent benefit from ad spend? Without independence, budget allocation and ROAS calculations may reflect agency incentives over actual performance. Key questions: revenue from ads, cross-channel attribution consistency, data governance, and auditable methodology.

Tami Harrigan·Jun 10, 2026·6 min readRead article →
AppsFlyerAppsFlyer

What eCommerce brands get wrong about retail media measurement

Retail media networks report ROAS using different methodologies, causing up to 63% fluctuation across networks for the same campaign. This isn't a data quality issue but a structural one. Brands using multiple networks face a fragmentation tax where each network is its own source of truth, and budget decisions based on these irreconcilable figures are misleading. Independent measurement, applying the same attribution logic across all networks, is needed to reconcile data and enable confident cross-channel decisions. The signal infrastructure for this already exists from mobile measurement.

Shani Rosenfelder·May 19, 2026·4 min readRead article →
Liftoff(Vungle)Liftoff(Vungle)

A Year of Spend Shifts: Inside the 2026 Finance & Crypto App Benchmark

The 2026 Finance & Crypto App Performance Benchmark reveals a 47% increase in UA spend and 2.15x re-engagement spend in 2025, with 8B+ global downloads. It analyzes spend gaps, retargeting shifts, and CPI by region and platform.

Komal Muthyalu | May 7·May 7, 2026·6 min readRead article →

More from SensorTower